The confusion between ESG standards and ESG frameworks is quite common, and it’s essential to clarify their differences. Despite their distinct roles, some people may still mix up ESG standards and frameworks. However, understanding their unique purposes can help companies navigate the complex landscape of sustainability reporting effectively.
What’s the difference between ESG Standards and Frameworks?
ESG Standards
ESG standards are more technical and specific as they set precise requirements that companies must meet in their reporting. The standards leave less room for interpretation compared to frameworks where they aim for consistency across industries and companies which ensure that reporting is comparable and transparent.
Standards provide detailed metrics and criteria for each ESG topic. Companies must adhere to these specific metrics when reporting. The standards cover areas such as carbon emissions, labour practices, and anti-corruption measures.
Example of ESG Reporting Standard:
ESG Frameworks
ESG frameworks serve as guidelines for companies to structure their sustainability reporting. They focus on principles rather than specific requirements. The primary goal is to provide a common structure for reporting ESG information. The frameworks outline the key areas that companies should address in their reports where they encourage companies to consider which material ESG topics relevant to their business.
The frameworks provide a roadmap for reporting, covering aspects such as environmental impact, social responsibility, and governance practices. They guide companies on what to report and how to structure their disclosures.
Example of ESG Reporting Framework:
In summary, ESG standards set specific requirements and ensure consistency, while ESG frameworks guide companies on what to report and provide a flexible structure. Organizations often use a combination of both to effectively communicate their ESG performance.
PIDM Membership Representation
